360 Surveillance on Asset Vaults
Bitcoin Bear Market: Panic or Just Another Tuesday?
Bitcoin Bear Bites: A Data Dive
Bitcoin's recent stumble into bear market territory – a 27% drop to $92,000 as of November 18th – has the crypto bros sweating. But before you panic sell or start day-drinking, let's look at the numbers. This isn't Bitcoin's first rodeo; it's the seventh bear market in the last five years. Bitcoin Hits Bear Market Territory. History Says the Cryptocurrency Will Do This Next. - AOL.com
The immediate trigger? Economic uncertainty and concerns about monetary policy. The market's collectively holding its breath, wondering if the Fed will blink and cut interest rates at the December meeting despite persistent inflation. Bitcoin tends to thrive when rates are falling, so this uncertainty is a headwind.
But zoom out, and the picture gets more interesting. Bitcoin has delivered an average annual return of 38% over the past five years, even with those seven bear markets factored in. That’s a hell of a risk premium, considering the volatility.
And speaking of volatility, let's address the elephant in the room: concentration. The amount of Bitcoin held on corporate balance sheets has more than doubled in the past year, and it's up 150% since the SEC greenlit spot Bitcoin ETFs in January 2024. So far, so good. But here's the rub: a significant chunk of that Bitcoin is concentrated in the hands of about a dozen companies. Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) alone accounts for half the total. (That’s a lot of eggs in one basket, to put it mildly.)
Institutional Bitcoin: Rounding Error or Real Revolution?
Institutional Holdings: The Real Story?
The narrative is that institutional adoption is driving Bitcoin's price. The number of large asset managers with positions in the iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) has more than doubled in the past year, and their shareholdings are up 154%. But let’s dig a little deeper. Those institutions collectively manage around $130 trillion in assets. Even a small allocation to Bitcoin can move the needle in percentage terms, but it’s still a rounding error in their overall portfolios.
I've looked at hundreds of these filings, and it strikes me that a lot of these institutions are likely running small, experimental Bitcoin positions. The data simply doesn't support the idea of a massive, coordinated institutional buying spree.
There's also the historical precedent. Following its first close in bear market territory, Bitcoin has historically returned an average of 6% over the next six months and 1% over the next year. It’s taken, on average, more than seven months – 218 days, to be exact – to reach a new record high after entering bear market territory.
Now, about President Trump. His election last November was supposed to be a boon for risk assets. The U.S. jobs market weakened substantially during the summer, yet inflation has worsened due to Trump's tariffs. This is a toxic cocktail for markets in general, and Bitcoin isn't immune.
The question is, how much of this drawdown is attributable to Trump's policies versus broader macroeconomic factors? That data isn't readily available, so we're left with speculation.
A False Sense of Security?
The increase in institutional ownership might give investors a false sense of security. The fact that Bitcoin has performed well when interest rates are falling is also not a guarantee of future performance. The past five years have been an anomaly, thanks to near-zero interest rates and massive fiscal stimulus. That era is over.
So, what's the takeaway?
Is This Just Another Bitcoin Blip?
Bitcoin's volatility remains a feature, not a bug. The concentration of holdings among a few players makes it vulnerable to outsized swings. And while institutional adoption is real, its impact is often overstated. This bear market is a reminder that Bitcoin is still a speculative asset, not a store of value. Trade accordingly.
